Updates to this feature are currently paused as we assess the best way to monitor and expose the large number of attacks on science that we're seeing from the current administration.
Science is at the core of a healthy democracy. But for years, presidential administrations have, in differing ways, sidelined scientific evidence and attacked scientific integrity.
Below is a running list of attacks on science. They include disappearing data, silenced scientists, suppressed studies, and other assaults on science-based policy. The list provides a representative sample of threats to the federal scientific enterprise—and a warning of what we face in the future. More information can be found in our peer-reviewed study and in our data repository.
Attacks on science
Analysis on Airborne Bacteria Suppressed
Dr. James Zahn, a research microbiologist at the USDA, asserted that he was prohibited on no fewer than 11 occasions from publicizing his research on the potential hazards to human health posed by airborne bacteria originating in farm wastes.
Underqualified Nominee Installed on FDA Reproductive Health Advisory Committee
A widespread public outcry occurred in response to an unqualified FDA nominee.
Workplace Safety Panel Nominees Face Political Litmus Tests
In a well-documented case involving the Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Tommy Thompson dismissed three well-qualified experts on ergonomics from a narrowly focused peer review panel at the NIOSH.
National Institute on Drug Abuse Subjects Scientific Appointees to Litmus Test
National Institute on Drug Abuse Subjects Scientific Appointees to Litmus Test.
Abstinence-Only Education
The Bush administration interfered with scientific work on sex education programs.
Science Overruled on Emergency Contraception
The FDA repeatedly placed ideological and political considerations over scientific evidence in handling the emergency contraceptive drug Plan B’s switch from prescription to over-the-counter access.
FDA’s Drug Safety System Fails to Protect Public
In September 2004, the pharmaceutical company, Merck, voluntarily withdrew its pain medication Vioxx from the market after evidence emerged that patients were at increased risk of heart attack while taking the drug.
Plywood Rule Used Industry Funded Research, Ignored Independent Scientific Studies
In 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a new air pollution rule that would exempt many plywood manufacturers from restrictions on the emission of formaldehyde and other pollutants into the air.
Chemical Industry Pressures EPA to Protect Herbicide, not Wildlife
Despite compiling hundreds of pages of evidence documenting the harmful effects of atrazine, a commonly used weed killer, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refused to regulate the herbicide.
Leveling a Mountain of Research on Mountaintop Removal Strip Mining
Internal government documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that Bush administration officials disregarded scientific studies conducted in preparation of an environmental impact statement on mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia.
Related resources
Activist Resource
Scientific Society Sign-On Letter
This open letter, signed by more than 40 prominent scientific societies and organizations, was delivered to Congress in March 2025.
Activist Resource
Cumulative Impacts: Recommendations for EPA
To improve environmental health, UCS prepared eight fact sheets summarizing the recommendations of the NEJAC Cumulative Impacts Workgroup to the EPA.
Activist Resource
Resources for Federal Scientists
Are you a federal scientist, contractor, or federal worker? Here are resources to have on hand during the Trump administration.
Explainer
Applications of Climate, Energy, and Environmental Justice
Assessing the key different types of justice (distributive, procedural, and restorative) within the climate and energy movements can be challenging.